░▒▓█≠█▓▒░

/////////////////////
///////anti////////
////function///////
//////////////////

transsupremacy:

“It would make no sense, then, to define gender as the cultural interpretation of sex, if sex is a gendered category. Gender ought not to be conceived merely as the cultural inscription of meaning on a pregiven sex (a juridical conception); gender must also designate the very apparatus of production whereby the sexes themselves are established. As a result, gender is not to culture as sex is to nature; gender is also the discursive/cultural means by which “sexed nature” or “a natural sex” is produced and established as “prediscursive,” prior to culture, a politically neutral surface on which culture acts.”

Judith Butler, Gender Trouble (via realneon)

generally find butler boring, but- this is important b/c the ways in which feminism tries to act like sex is the real of oppression and gender is just some social construct full of bullshit and liberalism. The two are completely inseparable- the moment sexed-functionalization was like, a thing,  gender existed. You dont even get sexed bodies with out it- its the demarcation and creation of a resource. 

  1. unobject reblogged this from realneon and added:
    (reblogging w/o commentary b/c its the first time I’ve seen it and I don’t have a compy right now~)
  2. anarchalibrary reblogged this from realneon and added:
    reblogging cuz i love this topic
  3. realneon reblogged this from unobject and added:
    for the (subtle and perhaps unintended) sense that sex was logically prior to gender. I am pretty sure that Butler’s...
  4. whendidthisbecomehotterthanthis reblogged this from unobject
  5. transsupremacy reblogged this from realneon
  6. pussy-strut said: ‘sex is a gendered category’ still basically melts my brain sometimes
  7. realneon posted this